IceTV wins appeal against Nine in database copyright case

IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] HCA 14 (22 April 2009) [AUSTLII]


The supreme court of Australia has found for the online TV media guide IceTV, in their long running copyright dispute with Australian TV broadcaster, the Nine Network. Channel 9 claimed that IceTV  infringed copyright of the weekly TV guide  which Nine produce for distribution via licensed parties such as newspapers.

IceTV’s position was that their guide was an an original work, due to the method of production of their database guide:

  1. An IceTV employee watched TV for three weeks in August 2004, noting TV programming characteristics such as the program, date, and time started. These details were entered into a database.
  2. After this initial “bootstrapping” exercise, the IceTV guide database was tweaked on a regular basis by comparison with the TV Guide of Nine. Where title and timing discrepancies occurred, the IceTV guide was altered to suit.

It was on this second method of production that Nine’s claim of infringement hinged.  Their claim was that using the title and timing information constituted a substantial infringement.

Nine’s claim was that IceTV’s method of compiling their TV guide reproduced a substantial part of Nine’s weekly guide, and on appeal, the Federal Court earlier found:

“Ice took, via the Aggregated Guides, precisely the pieces of information that reflected the exercise of skill and labour by Nine in determining the program for a particular day or other period “ Ice’s use of material derived from the time and title information … appropriated the most creative elements of the skill and labour utilised by Nine in creating the Weekly Schedules.”

By framing the interpretation of the term “substantial” in terms of the “exercise of skill and labour”, the court found that IceTV had indeed reproduced a substantial part of the Nine Weekly Schedule. The High Court, however, disagreed, basing its interpretation of “substantial” to be largely dependent on “originality”.

However, the expression of the time and title information, in respect of each programme, is not a form of expression which requires particular mental effort or exertion. The way in which the information can be conveyed is very limited. Expressing a title of a programme to be broadcast merely requires knowledge of the title, generally bestowed by the producer of the programme rather than by a broadcaster of it. Expressing the time at which a programme is broadcast, for public consumption, can only practically be done in words or figures relating to a 12 or 24-hour time cycle for a day. The authors of the Weekly Schedule (or the Nine Database) had little, if any, choice in the particular form of expression adopted, as that expression was essentially dictated by the nature of the information. That expression lacks the requisite originality (in the sense explained) for the part to constitute a substantial part.

On the question of whether structural relationships such as the order of programming, the court found:

Counsel for Nine sought to place importance upon the reproduction not only of time and title information in respect of each programme, but also of the chronological arrangement of the time and title information for various programmes. Whether a selection or arrangement of elements constitutes a substantial part of a work depends on the degree of originality of that selection or arrangement. In this case, a chronological arrangement of times at which programmes will be broadcast is obvious and prosaic, and plainly lacks the requisite originality.

The court found that that the time and title information in the IceGuide was not a reproduction of a substantial part of Nine’s weekly schedule.


Today, computer based databases are the primary repository of knowledge. Almost every website, from Google to your phone directory, is powered by a database. The current Web 2.0 generation of information sources embrace the reuse (or mash-up) of published information from a multitude of sources over the web.

Before this decision in IceTv v Nine,  The degree to which the database  producer or owner has a right over the constituent information within the database has been uncertain. This decision appears to clarify the position somewhat:

“Copyright does not protect facts or information …That facts are not protected is a crucial part of the balancing of competing policy considerations in copyright legislation. “

This decision favours third parties using basic factual  information from published databases (and websites in general).

Related Posts:

IceTV Announcement

High Court Judgement (AUSTLII)

Peter Black’s announcement post (with summary to come)

Lawfront’s announcement post (with summary to come)

Update: Warwick Rothnie’s summary of the judgement.

dd2vmdk relocated into the cloud

A while ago I wrote a tool to convert flat disk images (which we commonly call dd images) to VMWare .vmdk disk images (the original blog post on the tool, called dd2vmdk is posted here). I have in the mean time ceased development of it, but despite its relatively archaic nature, some still find it of use.

Today I relocated hosting of it to Google’s new cloud web application service, Google App Engine. My motivations to do this were to reduce adminitrative burden, to eliminate server costs, and to increase long term availability (the Java App Engine is Beta, so there might be some short term availability issues).

The relocation took roughly one hour of my time, was dead simple, and required no code modification, just the simple addition of a new text configuration file.

dd2vmdk is still available via my personal website.

Schatz Forensic launched

Since March I have returned to practicing under my own banner. I have taken this opportunity to change the name of my company to Schatz Forensic, to better reflect the focus of the business and the personal nature of the services that I offer. Schatz Forensic is now operating out of premesis in the Brisbane CBD, and continues to offer the same computer forensics and electronic discovery services that I have provided in the past.

libewf has relocated

This won’t be news to many, but I came across a colleague today who didn’t realise that the libewf project has moved home to sourceforge.

Libewf is the only open source implementation of the Expert Witness Format (EWF) file format, which is the de facto standard for storage of forensic disk images. This open source implementation contains numerous utilities, including a faster than LinEn, UNIX based, command line EWF acquisition program, ewfacquire, and a command line validation utility called ewfverify. This latter tool I have found extremely useful in automating the evidence preservation process.

Related news is that Joachim Metz, the creator of libewf has recently released libpff, an open source implementation of the Outlook PST, OST and PAB file formats.